{"id":418,"date":"2023-10-22T17:25:41","date_gmt":"2023-10-22T17:25:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/?p=418"},"modified":"2023-11-24T18:16:39","modified_gmt":"2023-11-24T18:16:39","slug":"do-we-believe-that-our-pets-are-better-than-the-average-pet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/22\/do-we-believe-that-our-pets-are-better-than-the-average-pet\/","title":{"rendered":"Do We Believe That Our Pets Are Better Than the Average Pet?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong>By Brad Bell<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pets are very important to us. &nbsp;We may consider them part of the family. &nbsp;Does our attachment to our pets make us feel that they have more positive attributes than the pets of other people?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Study 1, El-Alayli, Lystad, Webb, Hollingsworth, and Ciolli (2006) had participants rate their pets and the average pet on 22 personality attributes.&nbsp;&nbsp;Some of these were positive (e.g., loyal and friendly), and some of them were&nbsp;negative (e.g., lazy and mean). &nbsp;On the average, the participants rated their&nbsp;own pets as higher on the positive attributes than the average pet. &nbsp;Moreover,&nbsp;on the average, the participants rated their own pets as lower on the negative&nbsp;attributes than the average pet.  In their second study, participants rated their own pets and the &#8220;average person&#8217;s pet&#8221; on the same 22 attributes. The findings of their secondly replicated the above findings. &nbsp;Moreover, they found that this bias for perceiving one&#8217;s own pet more favorably was correlated with pet attachment. &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In other words, people who were more attached to their pets were more likely\u00a0to exhibit a stronger bias in the evaluation of their pets. (1)  Imagine the implications of the findings. \u00a0If your dog is running loose in the neighborhood, you may describe him as an &#8220;explorer.&#8221; \u00a0\u00a0However, your neighbors may describe him as &#8220;reckless.&#8221;<br><br><strong>Notes<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><strong><br><\/strong>1. \u00a0See their article for other findings.<br><br><strong>References<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><strong><br><\/strong>El-Alayli, A., Lystad, A. L., Webb, S. R., Hollingsworth, S. L., &amp; Ciolli, J. L. (2006). \u00a0Reigning cats and dogs: \u00a0A pet-enhancement bias and its link to pet attachment, pet-self similarity, self-enhancement, and well-being. \u00a0<em>Basic and Applied Social Psychology<\/em>,<em>\u00a028<\/em>, 131-143.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Brad Bell Pets are very important to us. &nbsp;We may consider them part of the family. &nbsp;Does our attachment to our pets make us feel that they have more positive attributes than the pets of other people? In Study 1, El-Alayli, Lystad, Webb, Hollingsworth, and Ciolli (2006) had participants rate their pets and the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/2023\/10\/22\/do-we-believe-that-our-pets-are-better-than-the-average-pet\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Do We Believe That Our Pets Are Better Than the Average Pet?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pets"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=418"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":486,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions\/486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psychologyandsociety.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}